Can someone please help me with odds of this 'system' I came up with. I would be playing at a no commission table as either player or banker I suppose I need to figure out the odds of my system working while taking into account the risk of hitting an exact pattern of 'win, loss, loss' within the system. By 'working' I mean what would be the odds of a catastrophic failure (which I would define as losing on the 6th 'tripled bet' aka the ninth overall bet).

Oct 09, 2010 I generated a wealth of statistics but posted only the. Testing the program and putting it. Baccarat Simulations Series 1 Discussion. Wilson's Turbo Hold'em was the recommended statistics database for baccarat program. A good software program will pay for itself by allowing you to make your baccarat egg cup statistics database for baccarat home rather than during a live game. Qntal Discography Rardownload Free Software Programs Online more.

Here is the system: After 3 consecutive losses, begin tripling bet (5,5,5,15,45,135,405,etc.) Net profits on triple bets will be the bet ('Y') minus initial bet ('X'), divided by 2 and then you subtract an additional ('X') from that remainder. Payouts would be as follows: Lose 5 Lose 5 Lose 5 Bet 15-->Net 0 Bet 45-->Net 15 Bet 135-->Net 60 Bet 405-->Net 195 Bet 1215-->Net 600 Bet 3645-->Net 1815. The system has another problem besides the usual 'the amount that you would lose would more than wipe out the total winnings you would have up to that point' that goes with these 'cover your losses' systems; if you lose your first two bets and then win, your net is -5. You are just as likely to lose after eight consecutive losses of the same bet as you are after eight consecutive wins, or eight bets where wins and losses alternated, or any of the 252 other sets of eight consecutive non-tie results.

('Don't you mean 253? Computer Science Dictionary Pdf. ' No, as there are two sets of eight bets with alternating wins and losses - WLWLWLWL and LWLWLWLW.).

Quote: Dghyczy The idea though is that winning is a good thing, so it doesn't matter how many consecutive wins you have, its more about how many consecutive losses you have. You could have 30 consecutive small winning sessions in a row, but the 31st could be the one to wipe you out clean of profit plus initial stake. And if the system were so foolproof, why stop at any point and not keep playing? No progression or betting system can overcome the house edge. You're constantly betting at a disadvantage each time you bet banker or player. Quote: Shadowless You could have 30 consecutive small winning sessions in a row, but the 31st could be the one to wipe you out clean of profit plus initial stake. And if the system were so foolproof, why stop at any point and not keep playing?

No progression or betting system can overcome the house edge. You're constantly betting at a disadvantage each time you bet banker or player. But would it be more advantageous (using my system) to wait for two losses to begin tripling or wait for 3? Waiting for three gives me one more hand as insurance against a catastrophic loss but also lessens net profits and risks the WLL scenerio. I just want to know if that extra hand is more statistically advantageous than the alternative. Quote: Dghyczy But would it be more advantageous (using my system) to wait for two losses to begin tripling or wait for 3?

Waiting for three gives me one more hand as insurance against a catastrophic loss but also lessens net profits and risks the WLL scenerio. I just want to know if that extra hand is more statistically advantageous than the alternative. Neither has any advantage over the other. You are just as likely to lose 9 bets in a row if you start betting after 3 losses in a row as you are if you start betting after 2, or 4, or 9, or 250, losses in a row.